Author r.david.murray
Recipients Amber.Yust, Andreas.Pelme, Hanxue.Lee, Lakin.Wecker, alex, belopolsky, cvrebert, dstufft, eric.araujo, ethan.furman, georg.brandl, gwrtheyrn, lemburg, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, shai, skip.montanaro, tim.peters, yselivanov
Date 2014-03-07.15:12:53
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
> it wasn't an accident, it was designed so modulo arithmetic could reasonably be implemented for time() objects (which hasn't been demanded or implemented since the datetime module was created)

Ah, interesting.  I just wrote a program last month where I was baffled that time didn't support arithmetic, and had to dodge painfully through datetime instances to do the arithmetic.  I asked about it on IRC and someone said it was because arithmetic on times was ambiguous because of timezones, and I just accepted that rather than wonder why it hadn't been implemented.

Otherwise I'm pretty sympathetic to the RFE, but I'd really like time arithmetic to work, so I guess I'd have to be -1 in that case, wouldn't I?
Date User Action Args
2014-03-07 15:12:54r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, lemburg, tim.peters, skip.montanaro, georg.brandl, ncoghlan, belopolsky, pitrou, eric.araujo, alex, cvrebert, ethan.furman, gwrtheyrn, Lakin.Wecker, yselivanov, shai, dstufft, Andreas.Pelme, Amber.Yust, Hanxue.Lee
2014-03-07 15:12:54r.david.murraysetmessageid: <>
2014-03-07 15:12:54r.david.murraylinkissue13936 messages
2014-03-07 15:12:53r.david.murraycreate