Message212242
> (Alternatively, we could redefine squares in Python. All other languages just have the regular squares; Python has a super *extra* square 2! That clearly makes squares in Python *better* than squares in other languages...)
Heh. I initially wasn't sure if I was just missing a super fancy feauture of Python, but I eventually concluded the 2 probably wasn't supposed to be there.
In the name of making Python better, since π and -1 have already been proposed as additional squares, I vote for including the constant e as well.
> Fixed, thanks for the report and the patch!
Great! Thanks. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-02-26 06:20:06 | nullishzero | set | recipients:
+ nullishzero, loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou, ezio.melotti, docs@python, python-dev |
2014-02-26 06:20:06 | nullishzero | set | messageid: <1393395606.42.0.519791617175.issue20740@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-02-26 06:20:06 | nullishzero | link | issue20740 messages |
2014-02-26 06:20:05 | nullishzero | create | |
|