Author ncoghlan
Recipients cvrebert, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, tim.peters
Date 2014-02-24.21:50:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CADiSq7ce_5U_mYBSQEi5MvNUrOKUAkA7PkUAjfrieX6D4thcdQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1393277938.07.0.272548577538.issue20630@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
I suspect if we'd thought of it back in the 3.0 or 3.1 time frame then
giving the Py3 None a consistent "sorts low" behaviour would have been more
likely.

At this stage of the Py3 life cycle, though, it seems simpler overall to
remain consistent with earlier Py3 releases.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-02-24 21:50:46ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, tim.peters, rhettinger, pitrou, cvrebert
2014-02-24 21:50:46ncoghlanlinkissue20630 messages
2014-02-24 21:50:45ncoghlancreate