Message 211657 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	larry, ncoghlan, yselivanov
Date	2014-02-19.21:24:50
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CADiSq7dRWyEGczWysevHkjhhJTryYCVis-To8AmgXOUtk1+cCQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1392843905.73.0.0292247586789.issue20684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
I think in 3.5 it may actually make sense to expose these as options (perhaps with different names), so yeah, I think separate flags is reasonable. The only plausible combined name would also be something like "legacy", and that would need to be assigned to more meaningful local variables for readability reasons anyway.

I think in 3.5 it may actually make sense to expose these as options
(perhaps with different names), so yeah, I think separate flags is
reasonable.

The only plausible combined name would also be something like "legacy", and
that would need to be assigned to more meaningful local variables for
readability reasons anyway.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-02-19 21:24:51	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, larry, yselivanov
2014-02-19 21:24:51	ncoghlan	link	issue20684 messages
2014-02-19 21:24:50	ncoghlan	create