This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients gvanrossum, larry, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2014-02-17.00:11:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJLOKJF-aGP1OdsjPGHVDfbRZjd_RGO+ypXVVs8vR8wLYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <CAP7+vJKNcvfcbxUb+Sk=3hPkvtFWtUPyG3v5d8RCmGagG5WwVA@mail.gmail.com>
Content
Then again Larry might appreciate a full list of what to cherrypick.

On Sunday, February 16, 2014, Guido van Rossum <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> Guido van Rossum added the comment:
>
> Right, that has been my understanding. Larry has said he'd give asyncio a
> generous exception because it's all new in 3.4.
>
> On Sunday, February 16, 2014, Yury Selivanov <report@bugs.python.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Yury Selivanov added the comment:
> >
> > I think we should just ask Larry to merge all commits for asyncio in 3.4.
> > I.e. we won't commit anything that should not go in 3.4 anyways.
> >
> > ----------
> >
> > _______________________________________
> > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue20648>
> > _______________________________________
> >
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org <javascript:;>>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20648>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2014-02-17 00:11:15gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, vstinner, larry, yselivanov
2014-02-17 00:11:15gvanrossumlinkissue20648 messages
2014-02-17 00:11:15gvanrossumcreate