➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients Martin.d'Anjou, benschmaus, bethard, docs@python, eric.araujo, eric.smith, martin.panter, mburger, paul.j3, r.david.murray, rhettinger, terry.reedy, tshepang
Date 2014-02-13.01:32:06
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1392255127.71.0.412477423218.issue9694@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> How about calling required arguments "required arguments"?
> ...
> Clear and unambiguous. With this approach the user does 
> not have to bloat the help to state "This is required".

+1 This is straight-forward, logical, and easy-to-read.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-02-13 01:32:08rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, terry.reedy, bethard, eric.smith, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, docs@python, benschmaus, tshepang, martin.panter, paul.j3, mburger, Martin.d'Anjou
2014-02-13 01:32:07rhettingersetmessageid: <1392255127.71.0.412477423218.issue9694@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-02-13 01:32:07rhettingerlinkissue9694 messages
2014-02-13 01:32:06rhettingercreate