Message210489
"If you want to keep the current approach, nothing prevents from using a
fixed "slack" value, independant of the selector (e.g. 1ms seems
reasonable)."
select() and kqueue() are able to sleep less than 1 ms. Using a slack of 1 ms would reduce the accuracy. I don't see why we should limit the accuracy. Why 1 ms? Because of poll/epoll? What about Windows and its resolution of 15.6 ms?
Well, under 1 ms, don't expect accurate results :-) For example on my fast Linux box, a select() with a timeout of 61 us takes 137 us (elapsed time measued in Python). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-02-07 16:39:32 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, gvanrossum, neologix |
2014-02-07 16:39:32 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1391791172.15.0.661382377277.issue20505@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-02-07 16:39:32 | vstinner | link | issue20505 messages |
2014-02-07 16:39:31 | vstinner | create | |
|