Author nikratio
Recipients Arfrever, elixir, inada.naoki, ishimoto, jwilk, loewis, mrabarnett, ncoghlan, nikratio, pitrou, rurpy2, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2014-02-04.04:04:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1391486663.13.0.667133203933.issue15216@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I think that any API that gives you a TextIOWrapper object with undesired properties is broken and needs to be fixed, rather than a workaround added to TextIOWrapper. 

That said, I defer to the wisdow of the core developers, and I'll be happy to implement whatever is deemed to be the right thing(tm). However, my opinion on this feature probably makes me unsuitable to drive a PEP for it :-).
History
Date User Action Args
2014-02-04 04:04:23nikratiosetrecipients: + nikratio, loewis, ishimoto, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, jwilk, mrabarnett, Arfrever, inada.naoki, rurpy2, serhiy.storchaka, elixir
2014-02-04 04:04:23nikratiosetmessageid: <1391486663.13.0.667133203933.issue15216@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-02-04 04:04:23nikratiolinkissue15216 messages
2014-02-04 04:04:22nikratiocreate