This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author scoder
Recipients benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, larry, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, scoder, terry.reedy, yselivanov
Date 2014-02-03.09:00:43
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <52EF5ABA.2030300@behnel.de>
In-reply-to <1391417157.42.0.336317136734.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> What "existing function introspection API"?  I wasn't aware there was an
> existing mechanism to provide signature metadata for builtin functions.

Not for builtin functions, but it's unclear to me why the API of builtin
functions should be different from that of Python functions (except, as I
said, for the existence of byte code).

I agree with Yury, however, that this discussion is unrelated to this ticket.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-02-03 09:00:43scodersetrecipients: + scoder, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, pitrou, larry, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, python-dev, yselivanov
2014-02-03 09:00:43scoderlinkissue17159 messages
2014-02-03 09:00:43scodercreate