This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, larry, neologix, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2014-02-03.01:06:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1391389619.33.0.977301136353.issue12187@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Ok, the new asyncio.subprocess module has been merged.

Use asyncio.create_subprocess_exec/shell to create a subprocess and then use asyncio.wait_for(proc.wait(), timeout) to wait for the exit of the process with a timeout. The wait is asynchronous thanks to asyncio internals.

I close the issue. I consider it fixed with the asyncio option. As I wrote, I don't think that it's possible to fix it in subprocess in a portable way without breaking backward compatibility. asyncio is new and so there is no risk of breaking the backward compatibility.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-02-03 01:06:59vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, gvanrossum, pitrou, larry, giampaolo.rodola, neologix
2014-02-03 01:06:59vstinnersetmessageid: <1391389619.33.0.977301136353.issue12187@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-02-03 01:06:59vstinnerlinkissue12187 messages
2014-02-03 01:06:59vstinnercreate