Message208230
I don't see the big win from this. You can rename variables in C any way you like. "functionname as c_basename" is to fix otherwise unavoidable collisions; this seems like a nice-to-have. And I already have a lot on my plate. I could consider it later but the priority for this is below converting functions.
Georg: I remind you that nearly every parsing function already has a variable called "args". To allow you to have a parameter called "args" would mean I'd have to have really complicated internal structure, where
the variable I declare in the parsing function would have a different
name from the parameter to the impl function. Do you really have a
burning, nearly incandescent need for this feature?
Zachary: You could minimize the size of the diff by using nested scopes:
_impl(...)
/*[clinic end generated code: checksum=...]*/
{
int use_overlapped = overlapped;
{
LP_OVERLAPPED overlapped;
... |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-01-16 03:16:19 | larry | set | recipients:
+ larry, georg.brandl, rmsr, zach.ware, serhiy.storchaka |
2014-01-16 03:16:19 | larry | set | messageid: <1389842179.42.0.409009879855.issue20227@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-01-16 03:16:19 | larry | link | issue20227 messages |
2014-01-16 03:16:18 | larry | create | |
|