This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients Arfrever, BreamoreBoy, asvetlov, bjornedstrom, christian.heimes, dstufft, englabenny, ezio.melotti, gregory.p.smith, haakon, habnabit, jcea, larry, loewis, markk, pitrou, python-dev, sbt, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2014-01-02.21:13:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1388697214.96.0.264637865157.issue16113@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Ok, this this remains a release blocker. I'm still +1 for removing it, and I'm -0 for removing it just before the release candidate. AFAICT, there is *zero* (.000000001) chance that it actually becomes a NIST standard before the Python release is made. According to the current timeline:

 http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/hash/sha-3/timeline_fips.html

the *submission to the secretary* (of commerce) was scheduled for Q2. With the current delay, this must become Q3, so the publication as a standard might happen in Q4 (not sure how long the Secretary of Commerce needs to study the specification of a hash algorithm).

What might happen is that a draft is published by the time the RC is made. I'd then still be -1 on including something in Python that only implements a draft standard. So we could just as well remove it right away.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-01-02 21:13:35loewissetrecipients: + loewis, tim.peters, gregory.p.smith, jcea, pitrou, vstinner, larry, christian.heimes, habnabit, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, asvetlov, englabenny, BreamoreBoy, python-dev, sbt, bjornedstrom, dstufft, markk, haakon
2014-01-02 21:13:34loewissetmessageid: <1388697214.96.0.264637865157.issue16113@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-01-02 21:13:34loewislinkissue16113 messages
2014-01-02 21:13:34loewiscreate