Author sbt
Recipients arigo, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, koobs, neologix, pitrou, sbt, vstinner
Date 2013-12-01.00:21:46
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1385857306.95.0.0854363681007.issue18885@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I've always had an implicit understanding that calls with timeouts may,
> for whatever reason, return sooner than requested (or later!), and the
> most careful approach is to re-check the clock again.

I've always had the implicit understanding that if I use an *infinite* timeout then the call will not timeout.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-12-01 00:21:46sbtsetrecipients: + sbt, gvanrossum, arigo, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, neologix, koobs
2013-12-01 00:21:46sbtsetmessageid: <1385857306.95.0.0854363681007.issue18885@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-12-01 00:21:46sbtlinkissue18885 messages
2013-12-01 00:21:46sbtcreate