Message204679
> The ticket has been closed by two people. Why do you keep re-opening the ticket?
Because you're not providing any arguments. If it is not important for you, just ignore. If something is not clear - ask. What you do is just closing the stuff, because you _feel_ that is not an issue. Provide rationale, address my points and then I'll close it myself. The particular stuff that is not clarified:
>> Post the link to correct process into README.rst and then this
>> issue can be closed.
> The repo readme is not the right place for this. Christian already
> mentioned the PEPs and anything should go into the dev guide.
I want to know why PEPs repository README is not the place to direct users to starting point for submitting enhancement proposals?
> If you have something to contribute, please open a ticket, add a patch
and request review.
I am already keep opening it, damn. I want to contribute an improvement for the PEP process and not forget about it. That's why I fill in into tracker, and not into email. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-11-28 17:19:30 | techtonik | set | recipients:
+ techtonik, lemburg, vstinner, christian.heimes, ezio.melotti, docs@python |
2013-11-28 17:19:30 | techtonik | set | messageid: <1385659170.9.0.824834529791.issue19822@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-11-28 17:19:30 | techtonik | link | issue19822 messages |
2013-11-28 17:19:30 | techtonik | create | |
|