This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gregory.p.smith
Recipients asvetlov, cvrebert, ezio.melotti, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, rosslagerwall, sarum9in, sbt, vstinner
Date 2013-11-25.08:29:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
adding {0,1,2} to fds_to_keep (populated from pass_fds) is indeed an alternate approach.  A variant of an alternate patch doing that attached.

This actually simplifies code.  Is there anything this would hurt that i'm not seeing?

I suppose it adds minor overhead to the fork_exec() call by passing more in and lookups into the fds_to_keep list now that it will always contain at least 4 values instead of the previous 1.  I doubt that is matters (I haven't measured anything).
Date User Action Args
2013-11-25 08:29:14gregory.p.smithsetrecipients: + gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, ezio.melotti, cvrebert, asvetlov, rosslagerwall, sbt, sarum9in
2013-11-25 08:29:14gregory.p.smithsetmessageid: <>
2013-11-25 08:29:14gregory.p.smithlinkissue15798 messages
2013-11-25 08:29:14gregory.p.smithcreate