Message203871
IIUC, the sequence of events is this:
1. touch
2. read old_mtime
3. date back 10s
4. touch
5. read mtime
So the time stamp that is set in step 3 is never read, correct? So there is no test that it is newer than the 10s-old-stamp, but only newer then the recent-stamp (step 2)? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-11-22 20:56:00 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, pitrou, tim.golden, brian.curtin |
2013-11-22 20:56:00 | loewis | set | messageid: <1385153760.03.0.527310741663.issue19715@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-11-22 20:56:00 | loewis | link | issue19715 messages |
2013-11-22 20:55:59 | loewis | create | |
|