Message202242
+1 on all Victor's points.
I like 'resolution' because this is the term that datetime module uses already:
>>> from datetime import *
>>> datetime.resolution
datetime.timedelta(0, 0, 1)
There is a slight chance of confusion stemming from the fact that datetime.resolution is timedelta, but proposed parameter is a string.
I believe ISO 8601 uses the word "accuracy" to describe this kind of format variations. I am leaning towards "resolution", but would like to hear from others. Here are the candidates:
1. resolution
2. accuracy
3. precision
(Note that "accuracy" is the shortest but "resolution" is the most correct.) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-11-05 21:24:47 | belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ belopolsky, gvanrossum, tim.peters, skip.montanaro, terry.reedy, vstinner, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, elixir |
2013-11-05 21:24:47 | belopolsky | set | messageid: <1383686687.39.0.777489179079.issue19475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-11-05 21:24:47 | belopolsky | link | issue19475 messages |
2013-11-05 21:24:47 | belopolsky | create | |
|