This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients christian.heimes, docs@python, mpb, r.david.murray
Date 2013-10-29.22:07:06
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1383084426.72.0.906406588747.issue19438@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
See http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0294/ for some background on this.  The unexpected thing is actually that the types module still exists at all in Python3 :)

That said, its documentation could, indeed, use some improvement to address this kind of question.

Searching the python-dev email list for 'NoneType removal types module" turns up some interesting posts, back in the 2.3 days...basically, type(None) is the One True Way to get NoneType :)
History
Date User Action Args
2013-10-29 22:07:06r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, christian.heimes, docs@python, mpb
2013-10-29 22:07:06r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1383084426.72.0.906406588747.issue19438@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-10-29 22:07:06r.david.murraylinkissue19438 messages
2013-10-29 22:07:06r.david.murraycreate