Message201297
Well, when a timeout is specified, .join() passes exactly the timeout passed to _it_ to ._wait_for_tstate_lock(), which in turn passes exactly the same timeout to .acquire(). So the negative value must be coming from _communicate() (the
self.stdout_thread.join(self._remaining_time(endtime))
line).
_remaining_time() in turn:
def _remaining_time(self, endtime):
"""Convenience for _communicate when computing timeouts."""
if endtime is None:
return None
else:
return endtime - _time()
So that just subtracts and doesn't do anything to ensure the result is positive, nor does the calling site check the return value. Most other _remaining_time() calls in subprocess.py *do* check the return value, so I think this is clearly a subprocess.py bug. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-10-25 21:36:24 | tim.peters | set | recipients:
+ tim.peters, pitrou |
2013-10-25 21:36:24 | tim.peters | set | messageid: <1382736984.31.0.401499741953.issue19399@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-10-25 21:36:24 | tim.peters | link | issue19399 messages |
2013-10-25 21:36:24 | tim.peters | create | |
|