Message200376
Attached patch checks that the db is actually closed after the `with`. Also, I noticed that dbm.dumb doesn't behave like the rest of the variants, as seen in the following:
>>> import dbm.dumb as d
>>> db = d.open('test.dat', 'c')
>>> db.close()
>>> db.keys()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/tank/libs/cpython/Lib/dbm/dumb.py", line 212, in keys
return list(self._index.keys())
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'keys'
>>>
vs
>>> import dbm.gnu as g
>>> db = g.open('test.dat', 'c')
>>> db.close()
>>> db.keys()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
_gdbm.error: GDBM object has already been closed
>>> |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-10-19 06:29:34 | Claudiu.Popa | set | recipients:
+ Claudiu.Popa, terry.reedy, kousu, Arfrever |
2013-10-19 06:29:34 | Claudiu.Popa | set | messageid: <1382164174.21.0.0746613752247.issue19282@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-10-19 06:29:34 | Claudiu.Popa | link | issue19282 messages |
2013-10-19 06:29:34 | Claudiu.Popa | create | |
|