Author gvanrossum
Recipients benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, koobs, larry, ned.deily, pitrou, python-dev, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner
Date 2013-10-18.17:22:07
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1382116927.94.0.872228190238.issue19262@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Maybe adding something that returns [] from suite() if therea re no threads in test/test_asyncio/__init__.py would help?  I don't have time to test this, but go ahead and commit something if it's a release blocker.

Even better would or course be to fix asyncio to actually work if there are no threads -- the only issue is what to do about run_in_executor(), I guess it will have to run the function in-line...
History
Date User Action Args
2013-10-18 17:22:07gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, georg.brandl, pitrou, vstinner, larry, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, skrah, python-dev, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, koobs
2013-10-18 17:22:07gvanrossumsetmessageid: <1382116927.94.0.872228190238.issue19262@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-10-18 17:22:07gvanrossumlinkissue19262 messages
2013-10-18 17:22:07gvanrossumcreate