Author pitrou
Recipients barry, christian.heimes, kristjan.jonsson, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2013-10-11.09:56:06
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <691672221.68628960.1381485360180.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net>
In-reply-to <1882276521.68616056.1381485110088.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net>
Content
> > Reading the code, I see we now maintain a small internal buffer in
> > the file object, rather than using stack allocation at the call
> > sites.  It is unclear to me how this saves memory, since the amount
> > of memory copying should be the same.
> 
> No, memory copying is suppressed in many cases.

To clarify: the import logic uses marshal.loads(), not marshal.load().
So the aim is really to speed up unmarshalling from memory.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-10-11 09:56:07pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, barry, kristjan.jonsson, vstinner, christian.heimes
2013-10-11 09:56:07pitroulinkissue19219 messages
2013-10-11 09:56:07pitroucreate