Author pitrou
Recipients arjennienhuis, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, durin42, ecir.hana, eric.smith, exarkun, ezio.melotti, flox, glyph, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, martin.panter, nlevitt@gmail.com, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, stendec, terry.reedy, uau, vstinner
Date 2013-10-08.21:11:39
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1381266697.2582.6.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <CAPLqtW+kVB9vx1bDWd+7MECXzCYVsA5zdN=7t+54vKme_DamTg@mail.gmail.com>
Content
> > > Punting this to 3.5 basically means we'll have to either wait for
> > > 3.5, or do something awful like use cffi to grab sprintf to port
> > > Mercurial.
> >
> > Or write a pure Python implementation.
> 
> Hah. Probably too slow for anything beyond a proof of concept, no?

If it's only for the Mercurial test suite, that shouldn't be a problem?
History
Date User Action Args
2013-10-08 21:11:40pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, loewis, barry, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, vstinner, eric.smith, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, glyph, ezio.melotti, durin42, arjennienhuis, flox, ecir.hana, uau, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, nlevitt@gmail.com, stendec
2013-10-08 21:11:40pitroulinkissue3982 messages
2013-10-08 21:11:39pitroucreate