Author pitrou
Recipients arjennienhuis, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, durin42, ecir.hana, eric.smith, exarkun, ezio.melotti, flox, glyph, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, martin.panter,, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, stendec, terry.reedy, uau, vstinner
Date 2013-10-08.15:08:36
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> Is there any chance we could just have it work for bytes, ints, and
> floats? That'd solve the immediate need, and it'd be obviously
> correct how to have those behave.

You mean "%s" and "%d"? 

> Punting this to 3.5 basically means we'll have to either wait for
> 3.5, or do something awful like use cffi to grab sprintf to port
> Mercurial.

Or write a pure Python implementation.
Date User Action Args
2013-10-08 15:08:36pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, loewis, barry, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, vstinner, eric.smith, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, glyph, ezio.melotti, durin42, arjennienhuis, flox, ecir.hana, uau, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka,, stendec
2013-10-08 15:08:36pitroulinkissue3982 messages
2013-10-08 15:08:36pitroucreate