This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author smichr
Recipients eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, michael.driscoll, orsenthil, python-dev, rhettinger, sandro.tosi, smichr, tim.peters
Date 2013-10-06.03:51:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
I probably wouldn't have noticed it except I was working more intensely
with the different random methods and saw that randrange had the note about
not supplying the 'int' argument and shuffle (though it had the same sort
of argument) did *not* have the comment. So that raised the issue for me.
Proabably the best thing would be do remove the comment from randrange and
make sure that the not-to-mess-with args are made private with the

Date User Action Args
2013-10-06 03:51:29smichrsetrecipients: + smichr, tim.peters, georg.brandl, rhettinger, orsenthil, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, sandro.tosi, python-dev, michael.driscoll
2013-10-06 03:51:29smichrlinkissue14927 messages
2013-10-06 03:51:29smichrcreate