This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients christian.heimes, docs@python, dsuch, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, pitrou
Date 2013-09-26.12:40:23
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1946526867.24902757.1380199216762.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net>
In-reply-to <1380192312.26.0.370034789618.issue19095@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> But the current behavior of returning None is documented and people
> depend on it so straightening it out would break backward
> compatibility - it's up to you to decide. I wouldn't mind it
> personally.

I'm not sure people depend on getpeercert() returning None before the
handshake is done, or perhaps by accident?

> But as far as this ticket goes - I'm on 2.7 and it's set in stone so
> for 2.7 - can you please change copy only? If you decide that for
> 3.x an exception will be raised then such a caveat would be included
> in 2.7 docs as well.

Yes, if we change behaviour it will only be in 3.4.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-09-26 12:40:23pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, janssen, dsuch, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, docs@python
2013-09-26 12:40:23pitroulinkissue19095 messages
2013-09-26 12:40:23pitroucreate