This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author cdosborn
Recipients cdosborn, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, r.david.murray
Date 2013-09-24.06:49:55
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1380005396.93.0.322839502786.issue18764@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
In 2.7 there is no documented command *print, the docs are explicit on this (it's just the built in statement). However, 3.4 treats print like a feature of 2.7. Is this to maintain backwards compatibility? I would suggest preserving the original direction of the pdb, where a user has access to a p command but a user can always use the built in python print function.

in short:
-remove print from documented commands
-remove print alias

*This is my first patch :P Let me know if this is the correct direction, and what needs to be changed for acceptance, thanks.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-09-24 06:49:57cdosbornsetrecipients: + cdosborn, georg.brandl, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray
2013-09-24 06:49:56cdosbornsetmessageid: <1380005396.93.0.322839502786.issue18764@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-09-24 06:49:56cdosbornlinkissue18764 messages
2013-09-24 06:49:56cdosborncreate