Author michael.foord
Recipients asvetlov, benjamin.peterson, charettes, ezio.melotti, fabioz, gvanrossum, matthewlmcclure, matthewlmcclure-gmail, meador.inge, michael.foord, pitrou, python-dev, r.david.murray, rhettinger, terry.reedy, tim.peters, tomwardill
Date 2013-09-19.11:58:35
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1379591915.71.0.336158598516.issue11798@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
That would only be a shallow copy, so I'm not sure it's worth the effort. The test has the opportunity in the setUp to ensure that initial state is correct - so I would leave that per test. Obviously sharing state between tests is prima facie bad, but any framework reusing test suites is doing that already.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-09-19 11:58:35michael.foordsetrecipients: + michael.foord, gvanrossum, tim.peters, rhettinger, terry.reedy, pitrou, fabioz, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, matthewlmcclure, asvetlov, meador.inge, python-dev, tomwardill, matthewlmcclure-gmail, charettes
2013-09-19 11:58:35michael.foordsetmessageid: <1379591915.71.0.336158598516.issue11798@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-09-19 11:58:35michael.foordlinkissue11798 messages
2013-09-19 11:58:35michael.foordcreate