Author pitrou
Recipients asvetlov, benjamin.peterson, charettes, ezio.melotti, fabioz, gvanrossum, matthewlmcclure, matthewlmcclure-gmail, meador.inge, michael.foord, pitrou, python-dev, r.david.murray, rhettinger, terry.reedy, tim.peters, tomwardill
Date 2013-09-14.22:07:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1379196424.2.0.575553073189.issue11798@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Yes, but that's not the point. Legitimate use cases can be broken by the change, so at least there should be an easy way to disable the new behaviour.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-09-14 22:07:04pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, tim.peters, rhettinger, terry.reedy, fabioz, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, michael.foord, matthewlmcclure, asvetlov, meador.inge, python-dev, tomwardill, matthewlmcclure-gmail, charettes
2013-09-14 22:07:04pitrousetmessageid: <1379196424.2.0.575553073189.issue11798@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-09-14 22:07:04pitroulinkissue11798 messages
2013-09-14 22:07:04pitroucreate