Author pitrou
Recipients barry, eli.bendersky, eric.snow, ethan.furman, georg.brandl, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray
Date 2013-09-14.10:13:24
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1379153602.2498.4.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <1379142202.93.0.0299161539603.issue18989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Le samedi 14 septembre 2013 à 07:03 +0000, Georg Brandl a écrit :
> Georg Brandl added the comment:
> 
> That said, for a PEP that has seen so much discussion before being
> accepted, the agreed-on API should not be changed lightly.

I agree with that.
Also, I think it was argued that Enums are by design "restricted"
classes in that they forbid certain things in the name of convenience
and expectability. I think it is a reasonable design point and, as such,
Enums needn't be as flexible and versatile as normal classes.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-09-14 10:13:24pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, barry, georg.brandl, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, eli.bendersky, ethan.furman, eric.snow
2013-09-14 10:13:24pitroulinkissue18989 messages
2013-09-14 10:13:24pitroucreate