Message196995
It's likely that asyncore won't be able to take any practical advantage from this integration.
To say one, epoll()/kqueue() pollers won't bring any speedup over select()/poll() because of how asyncore.loop() function is implemented (see http://bugs.python.org/issue6692#msg103628 and http://bugs.python.org/issue11273).
Also, the new selectors module only takes read and write events into account, whereas asyncore explicitly closes dispatcher in case of disconnection events (POLLOUT, etc).
In summary I'd say it's a lot wiser to leave asyncore alone and consider it frozen. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-09-05 13:08:38 | giampaolo.rodola | set | recipients:
+ giampaolo.rodola, vstinner |
2013-09-05 13:08:38 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messageid: <1378386518.52.0.788857730155.issue18923@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-09-05 13:08:38 | giampaolo.rodola | link | issue18923 messages |
2013-09-05 13:08:38 | giampaolo.rodola | create | |
|