This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author madison.may
Recipients aisaac, madison.may, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, westley.martinez
Date 2013-09-01.23:08:54
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
> What do R, SciPy, Fortran, Matlab or other statistical packages already do? 

Numpy avoids recalculating the cumulative distribution by introducing a 'size' argument to numpy.random.choice().  The cumulative distribution is calculated once, then 'size' random choices are generated and returned.

Their overall implementation is quite similar to the method suggested in the python docs.  

>>> choices, weights = zip(*weighted_choices)
>>> cumdist = list(itertools.accumulate(weights))
>>> x = random.random() * cumdist[-1]
>>> choices[bisect.bisect(cumdist, x)]

The addition of a 'size' argument to random.choice() has already been discussed (and rejected) in Issue18414, but this was on the grounds that the standard idiom for generating a list of random choices ([random.choice(seq) for i in range(k)]) is obvious and efficient.
Date User Action Args
2013-09-01 23:08:54madison.maysetrecipients: + madison.may, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, pitrou, aisaac, westley.martinez, serhiy.storchaka
2013-09-01 23:08:54madison.maysetmessageid: <>
2013-09-01 23:08:54madison.maylinkissue18844 messages
2013-09-01 23:08:54madison.maycreate