Message196064
Using tulip-inspired method names (when tulip hasn't landed) to duplicate existing data input functionality (feed() and close()) seems a rather dubious design decision to me.
Given how popular lxml.etree is as an alternative to the standard library's etree implementation, we shouldn't dismiss Stefan's design concerns lightly. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-08-24 06:26:19 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, jcea, scoder, eli.bendersky, flox, python-dev |
2013-08-24 06:26:19 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1377325579.13.0.569670181638.issue17741@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-08-24 06:26:19 | ncoghlan | link | issue17741 messages |
2013-08-24 06:26:18 | ncoghlan | create | |
|