This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pmoody
Recipients christian.heimes, jcea, leim, macfreek, ncoghlan, pmoody, santoso.wijaya, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date 2013-08-18.15:31:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1376839897.73.0.854433532618.issue17400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm still not convinced. The rfc still says in essence "It's not private like rfc1918 space, but sometimes certain people can treat it similarly." and I think it would be pretty surprising for ipaddress to return True if it's not a network operator running the query. Since we have no way of knowing that, I'm extremely disinclined to make this change. A more formal solution would be all of the possible "is_RFCXXXX" methods, but that doesn't seem to be worth the effort.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-08-18 15:31:37pmoodysetrecipients: + pmoody, terry.reedy, jcea, ncoghlan, vstinner, macfreek, christian.heimes, santoso.wijaya, leim
2013-08-18 15:31:37pmoodysetmessageid: <1376839897.73.0.854433532618.issue17400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-08-18 15:31:37pmoodylinkissue17400 messages
2013-08-18 15:31:37pmoodycreate