Message195568
I'm still not convinced. The rfc still says in essence "It's not private like rfc1918 space, but sometimes certain people can treat it similarly." and I think it would be pretty surprising for ipaddress to return True if it's not a network operator running the query. Since we have no way of knowing that, I'm extremely disinclined to make this change. A more formal solution would be all of the possible "is_RFCXXXX" methods, but that doesn't seem to be worth the effort. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-08-18 15:31:37 | pmoody | set | recipients:
+ pmoody, terry.reedy, jcea, ncoghlan, vstinner, macfreek, christian.heimes, santoso.wijaya, leim |
2013-08-18 15:31:37 | pmoody | set | messageid: <1376839897.73.0.854433532618.issue17400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-08-18 15:31:37 | pmoody | link | issue17400 messages |
2013-08-18 15:31:37 | pmoody | create | |
|