This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients christian.heimes, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2013-08-18.05:47:33
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
Attaching the detailed results of a CacheGrind analysis.  Here are the high-points (all of which were expected):

* The last level data cache miss-rate improved 12% (from 4.9% to 4.3%).
* The first level data cache miss-rate improved 14% (from 5.5% to 4.7%).
* The additional code caused the instruction cache miss-rate to get slightly worse (from .32% to .40%).

The last level cache misses are the most important.  Per the cachegrind docs, "an L1 miss will typically cost around 10 cycles, [and] an LL miss can cost as much as 200 cycles."
Date User Action Args
2013-08-18 05:47:34rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, vstinner, christian.heimes, serhiy.storchaka
2013-08-18 05:47:34rhettingersetmessageid: <>
2013-08-18 05:47:34rhettingerlinkissue18771 messages
2013-08-18 05:47:34rhettingercreate