Message194177
I got the impression from what I read that -e included additional control sequences, but perhaps I misunderstood and that only meant that the data stream was expected to *use* additional control sequences but the control codes themselves are part of the base codec?
I'm specifically thinking of this statement from the linked reference:
"Because HTML uses the Unicode bidirectionality algorithm, conforming documents encoded using ISO 8859-8 must be labeled as "ISO-8859-8-i". Explicit directional control is also possible with HTML, but cannot be expressed with ISO 8859-8, so "ISO-8859-8-e" should not be used."
The "cannot be expressed" seems to imply there are differences in the codec. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-08-02 14:37:42 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, lemburg, barry, ezio.melotti |
2013-08-02 14:37:42 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1375454262.69.0.534466060897.issue18624@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-08-02 14:37:42 | r.david.murray | link | issue18624 messages |
2013-08-02 14:37:42 | r.david.murray | create | |
|