Message 194027 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rschoon
Recipients	rschoon
Date	2013-07-31.22:48:21
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1375310901.82.0.276465395742.issue18610@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
wsgiref.validator requires wsgi.input's read to always give EXACTLY one argument. This is incorrect. It's own documentation says: * That wsgi.input is used properly: - .read() is called with zero or one argument PEP3333 says: A server should allow read() to be called without an argument, and return the remainder of the client's input stream.

wsgiref.validator requires wsgi.input's read to always give EXACTLY one argument. This is incorrect.

It's own documentation says:
* That wsgi.input is used properly:
  - .read() is called with zero or one argument

PEP3333 says:
A server should allow read() to be called without an argument, and return the remainder of the client's input stream.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-07-31 22:48:21	rschoon	set	recipients: + rschoon
2013-07-31 22:48:21	rschoon	set	messageid: <1375310901.82.0.276465395742.issue18610@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-07-31 22:48:21	rschoon	link	issue18610 messages
2013-07-31 22:48:21	rschoon	create