Author JBernardo
Recipients JBernardo, neologix, pitrou, rhettinger, sbt
Date 2013-07-24.13:03:41
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
> Charles-Fran├žois's point about the algorithmic complexity is 
> legitimate, so I think he was actually waiting for you to amend
> your patch ;)

This doesn't seems to be the actual issue as it would require a big change for something that wasn't proven important... The old behavior is still O(1) in the new implementation. 

I might change that, but can someone give me an actual idea to implement that? Also, this can be done on another patch.

** The real problem **

I pointed out one issue about which conditions should be considered when waking up and there was no answer:

Also, Richard Oudkerk wrote he was expecting "wait_for_any() return a list":

I need to get feedback about the first one to change the second one.
Date User Action Args
2013-07-24 13:03:42JBernardosetrecipients: + JBernardo, rhettinger, pitrou, neologix, sbt
2013-07-24 13:03:42JBernardosetmessageid: <>
2013-07-24 13:03:42JBernardolinkissue18078 messages
2013-07-24 13:03:41JBernardocreate