Author JBernardo
Recipients JBernardo, neologix, pitrou, rhettinger, sbt
Date 2013-07-24.13:03:41
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1374671022.02.0.933784909319.issue18078@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Charles-Fran├žois's point about the algorithmic complexity is 
> legitimate, so I think he was actually waiting for you to amend
> your patch ;)

This doesn't seems to be the actual issue as it would require a big change for something that wasn't proven important... The old behavior is still O(1) in the new implementation. 

I might change that, but can someone give me an actual idea to implement that? Also, this can be done on another patch.


** The real problem **

I pointed out one issue about which conditions should be considered when waking up and there was no answer: http://bugs.python.org/msg190556

Also, Richard Oudkerk wrote he was expecting "wait_for_any() return a list": http://bugs.python.org/msg190597

I need to get feedback about the first one to change the second one.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-07-24 13:03:42JBernardosetrecipients: + JBernardo, rhettinger, pitrou, neologix, sbt
2013-07-24 13:03:42JBernardosetmessageid: <1374671022.02.0.933784909319.issue18078@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-07-24 13:03:42JBernardolinkissue18078 messages
2013-07-24 13:03:41JBernardocreate