This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients adlaiff6, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, eric.araujo, eric.smith, eric.snow, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, gjb1002, jackdied, lemburg, rhettinger, salty-horse, santoso.wijaya, terry.reedy
Date 2013-07-11.07:29:10
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1373527751.1.0.421336581791.issue1820@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Unassigning until another patch arrives that moves this forward.

The basic idea is well established:  Get the structseq API to match the named tuple API as much as possible.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-07-11 07:29:11rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, lemburg, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, gjb1002, belopolsky, salty-horse, jackdied, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, adlaiff6, eric.araujo, santoso.wijaya, eric.snow
2013-07-11 07:29:11rhettingersetmessageid: <1373527751.1.0.421336581791.issue1820@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-07-11 07:29:11rhettingerlinkissue1820 messages
2013-07-11 07:29:10rhettingercreate