Message191764
> I did this to use the same abstraction that was used extensively for
> other purposes, instead of recreating the same abstraction with a deque
> as its basis.
So you wanted a FIFO queue and preferred the API of Queue to that of deque? Well it will be *much* less efficient. queue.Queue is also less efficient, but not by such a wide margin.
I have added a documentation note. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-06-24 14:00:01 | sbt | set | recipients:
+ sbt, python-dev, shwouchk |
2013-06-24 14:00:01 | sbt | set | messageid: <1372082401.45.0.506055820067.issue18277@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-06-24 14:00:01 | sbt | link | issue18277 messages |
2013-06-24 14:00:01 | sbt | create | |
|