Message 190592 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	Julian, aliles, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, ncoghlan, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2013-06-04.08:49:52
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1370335792.97.0.263492659915.issue18054@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I like the idea of using the strategy pattern to at least decouple the assertion API from the main testcase API. I also like it better than the mixin suggested earlier. We would obviously have to keep the existing methods for backwards compatibility, but could avoid adding new ones. I'm not sure what such an API would look like, though :(

I like the idea of using the strategy pattern to at least decouple the assertion API from the main testcase API. I also like it better than the mixin suggested earlier.

We would obviously have to keep the existing methods for backwards compatibility, but could avoid adding new ones.

I'm not sure what such an API would look like, though :(

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-06-04 08:49:53	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, rhettinger, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, Julian, aliles, serhiy.storchaka
2013-06-04 08:49:52	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <1370335792.97.0.263492659915.issue18054@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-06-04 08:49:52	ncoghlan	link	issue18054 messages
2013-06-04 08:49:52	ncoghlan	create