Author gvanrossum
Recipients brett.cannon, eli.bendersky, ethan.furman, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, rhettinger, vstinner
Date 2013-05-13.18:37:03
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1368470223.77.0.892473170027.issue17963@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
As I explained in issue 17947, I think that any Python implementation worth its salt should be able to implement sys.get_calling_module_name() (*), at least for the case where the caller is top-level code in a module body.  That is a much weaker requirement than being able to implement sys._getframe().  We should just add this to CPython 3.4 and require that conforming implementations support it, at least in the stated context (top-level caller).

(*) Please pick a somewhat shorter name for it.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-05-13 18:37:03gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, brett.cannon, rhettinger, ncoghlan, vstinner, eli.bendersky, ethan.furman
2013-05-13 18:37:03gvanrossumsetmessageid: <1368470223.77.0.892473170027.issue17963@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-05-13 18:37:03gvanrossumlinkissue17963 messages
2013-05-13 18:37:03gvanrossumcreate