➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, isoschiz, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pconnell, pitrou, ubershmekel
Date 2013-05-09.05:05:28
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJJjU2kVBmPYFA3cjn+-A+0=QUBy=UaL+TLdySxG3cEXwA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1368069543.54.0.816321792328.issue17927@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
I thought about that but I like this version better because the super()
code does not have to know the details of how to find the cell.

On Wednesday, May 8, 2013, Nick Coghlan wrote:

>
> Nick Coghlan added the comment:
>
> Guido, did you try combining your first patch (clearing the local var when
> populating the cell) with your second patch (by only checking for a cell
> when the local var is cleared rather than when it is populated)?
>
> It seems slightly more logical to me to have a cell fallback for the
> "local ref is NULL" case than it does to special case "local ref is not
> NULL".
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org <javascript:;>>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17927>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2013-05-09 05:05:28gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, ubershmekel, pconnell, isoschiz
2013-05-09 05:05:28gvanrossumlinkissue17927 messages
2013-05-09 05:05:28gvanrossumcreate