Author neologix
Recipients Trundle, abacabadabacaba, benhoyt, brian.curtin, christian.heimes, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, loewis, ncoghlan, neologix, nvetoshkin, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, socketpair, terry.reedy, tim.golden, torsten, twouters, vstinner
Date 2013-05-06.09:36:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> I don't think that's true in general, or true of how other Python APIs work. For instance, many APIs return a "file-like object", and you can only do certain things on that object, depending on what the documentation says, or what EAFP gets you. Some file-like object don't support seek/tell, some don't support close, etc. I've seen plenty of walk-like-a-duck checks like this:

Yes, I'm fully aware duck-typing ;-)
But here, you're saying that "a duck has a beak, but it *may* have
legs, a tail, etc".
It's just looks wrong to me on so many levels.

Please bring this up on python-dev.
Date User Action Args
2013-05-06 09:36:30neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, loewis, twouters, rhettinger, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, tim.golden, eric.araujo, Trundle, brian.curtin, benhoyt, torsten, nvetoshkin, abacabadabacaba, socketpair, serhiy.storchaka
2013-05-06 09:36:30neologixlinkissue11406 messages
2013-05-06 09:36:29neologixcreate