Message 18817 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	benson_basis
Recipients
Date	2003-11-25.21:53:56
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to

Content
Logged In: YES user_id=876734 I only see one possible issue with the patch. I exploited the existing BLDLIBRARY macro. It says '-L.' on linux. Which is fine for the initial 'make', but not too great when the Makefile gets copied to the install dir. The comments in the config dir leave me thinking that there would be a Makefile.pre in there, but there isn't. Just a Makefile. The RUNSHARED macro ends up set back to where I built it, not to where I installed it. If some process would fix RUNSHARED, it could also fix BLDSHARED.

Logged In: YES 
user_id=876734

I only see one possible issue with the patch.

I exploited the existing BLDLIBRARY macro. It says '-L.' on 
linux. Which is fine for the initial 'make', but not too great 
when the Makefile gets copied to the install dir.

The comments in the config dir leave me thinking that there 
would be a Makefile.pre in there, but there isn't. Just a 
Makefile.

The RUNSHARED macro ends up set back to where I built it, 
not to where I installed it. If some process would fix 
RUNSHARED, it could also fix BLDSHARED.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-08-23 14:17:56	admin	link	issue832799 messages
2007-08-23 14:17:56	admin	create