Author ethan.furman
Recipients benjamin.peterson, daniel.urban, ethan.furman, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan
Date 2013-04-28.05:57:54
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <517CBA65.7030606@stoneleaf.us>
In-reply-to <1367120874.39.0.209581560629.issue17853@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Nick, thanks for the explanation.

Benjamin, I was referring to Nick taking 3.3 and 3.2 off the issue and leaving 3.4, and you reversing it.  ;)

Sorry for the confusion -- I just reread my post and the words there didn't match the ideas in my head at the time very 
well.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-04-28 05:57:55ethan.furmansetrecipients: + ethan.furman, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, daniel.urban
2013-04-28 05:57:55ethan.furmanlinkissue17853 messages
2013-04-28 05:57:54ethan.furmancreate