Author Stijn.Hoop
Recipients BreamoreBoy, Stijn.Hoop, ankitoshniwal, dfranke, loewis, mcjeff, r.david.murray
Date 2013-04-19.09:09:27
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1366362567.43.0.264841986692.issue5004@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
So after a good nights sleep: does it not make sense to use the canonical hostname iff the name argument is not present / empty? Otherwise, fall back to the documented steps? That way extra API is avoided, and I can't think of a case where you would rather have my weird results vs "the output of hostname -f".
History
Date User Action Args
2013-04-19 09:09:27Stijn.Hoopsetrecipients: + Stijn.Hoop, loewis, r.david.murray, dfranke, mcjeff, BreamoreBoy, ankitoshniwal
2013-04-19 09:09:27Stijn.Hoopsetmessageid: <1366362567.43.0.264841986692.issue5004@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-04-19 09:09:27Stijn.Hooplinkissue5004 messages
2013-04-19 09:09:27Stijn.Hoopcreate