Author barry
Recipients barry, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray
Date 2013-04-19.01:03:23
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <20130418210216.28432550@anarchist>
In-reply-to <>
On Apr 19, 2013, at 12:37 AM, R. David Murray wrote:

>And what if it weren't a print statement?  An error is better than a
>"randomly" changed value, I think.  I'm really not sure there is anything we
>can do here, beyond Ezio's warning suggestion.

Right.  The point is, is it more helpful to have an unexpected value in the
local (e.g. None, which in fact may not be *totally* unexpected) or an
mystical exception? ;)

A warning would be fine.  I just want to give programmers some help in trying
to figure out why their code is wrong.
Date User Action Args
2013-04-19 01:03:24barrysetrecipients: + barry, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray
2013-04-19 01:03:24barrylinkissue17792 messages
2013-04-19 01:03:23barrycreate