Author larry
Recipients Mark.Shannon, docs@python, georg.brandl, larry, loewis, pitrou
Date 2013-04-01.04:55:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1364792113.39.0.322309380276.issue17589@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Py_INCREF usable as an rvalue sounds more like an accident
> than a deliberate feature

I'd go with "misfeature", but in no way is it accidental.  The coding deliberately preserves the rvalue-ness of it, c.f. _Py_REF_DEBUG_COMMA.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-04-01 04:55:13larrysetrecipients: + larry, loewis, georg.brandl, pitrou, docs@python, Mark.Shannon
2013-04-01 04:55:13larrysetmessageid: <1364792113.39.0.322309380276.issue17589@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-04-01 04:55:13larrylinkissue17589 messages
2013-04-01 04:55:13larrycreate