Author sbt
Recipients mrjbq7, neologix, pitrou, sbt
Date 2013-03-27.21:59:38
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <51536BB5.6070106@gmail.com>
In-reply-to <CAH_1eM0EDSccmWdcCRNqXSo1JfjyMkEw+wob25h=+_OULHOV+A@mail.gmail.com>
Content 
On 27/03/13 21:09, Charles-François Natali wrote:
> I could, but I don't have to: a shared memory won't incur any I/O or 
> copy (except if it is swapped). A file-backed mmap will incur a *lot* 
> of I/O: really, just try writting a 1GB file, and you'll see your disk 
> spin, or use cat /proc/diskstats.

You are right.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-03-27 21:59:38sbtsetrecipients: + sbt, pitrou, mrjbq7, neologix
2013-03-27 21:59:38sbtlinkissue17560 messages
2013-03-27 21:59:38sbtcreate